Comparison

Free Start Ready Check vs Decision Pack vs Resolution Plan

A direct comparison based on the question being answered, the information used and the professional work performed.

Service comparisonPublishedReviewed 3 September 2026England

Question answered

What is the difference between the free check, Decision Pack and Resolution Plan?

The direct answer

They answer different questions and should not be treated as bronze, silver and gold versions of the same report.

The free check diagnoses the apparent readiness position from the answers supplied. The £395 Decision Pack applies professional judgement to that assessment and orders the immediate route. The £950 Resolution Plan examines agreed actual evidence and builds a verified resolution route across connected matters.

Choose according to the uncertainty. If you know what to ask and your existing team can close it, use the free route. If the priorities and sequence are unclear, use the Decision Pack. If the answer depends on what the documents actually show, use the Resolution Plan.

Decision rule

Assessment uncertainty points to the Decision Pack. Evidence uncertainty points to the Resolution Plan. A clear free action points back to your existing team.

Why this matters

The decision sits across several workstreams.

A fixed-fee product stays useful only when its boundary is clear. Asking an assessment-led pack to verify documents creates false confidence or uncontrolled scope.

The Resolution Plan should not be purchased where a straightforward question to an appointed adviser will resolve the matter.

Project Activation begins only when the owner wants implementation support after the route is understood.

Compare the routes

FeatureFree check£395 Decision Pack£950 Resolution Plan
BasisAnswers suppliedAssessment-led professional interpretationAgreed actual evidence
Core outputPreliminary position and actionsDecision Position and ordered 30-day routeVerified position, findings and resolution route
Evidence reviewNoNoYes, within agreed allowance
Professional callNo20-minute Decision CallAs defined by the Resolution Plan process
RecheckRepeat or update the free assessmentOne assessment-based RecheckOne evidence-led Recheck
Best whenThe owner can act with the existing teamPriorities and sequence remain unclearThe documents themselves must be tested

The readiness test

Five checks to put on the record.

01

Information source

Decide whether the answer can come from your responses or requires inspection of actual project documents.

Evidence to identify: Assessment record or agreed evidence set.
02

Number of connected issues

One central decision can fit the Decision Pack. Several interacting matters may need the Resolution Plan.

Evidence to identify: Priority list and dependency map.
03

Professional judgement

Identify whether you need questions only, prioritisation, evidence findings or active coordination.

Evidence to identify: Defined product output and appointment scope.
04

Existing team capacity

Use appointed advisers where the issue falls clearly within their existing responsibility.

Evidence to identify: Professional appointments and written responses.
05

Decision timing

Match the depth of work to the date and significance of the contract, payment or mobilisation decision.

Evidence to identify: Decision deadline and programme.

What to do now

A controlled sequence for the owner.

  1. Complete the assessment

    Use the free output and relevant guides first.

  2. Ask the existing team

    Send the named questions to the people already responsible.

  3. Identify what remains unclear

    Separate a prioritisation problem from an evidence problem.

  4. Select the product boundary

    Choose Decision Pack or Resolution Plan only where its defined work answers the remaining uncertainty.

  5. Move into implementation

    Use Project Activation only if you want the agreed route coordinated for you.

Warning signs

Pause and ask for clarity if any of these appear.

  • A product is selected by project value rather than the question that needs answering.
  • Someone expects the free check or £395 Decision Pack to include project document review.
  • The owner has not used the free actions or asked the existing advisers first.
  • The scope contains several professional disciplines but no agreed evidence allowance.
  • Coordination and unlimited follow-up are assumed to be part of a report product.

From project experience

The practical pattern.

A clear boundary protects the client as much as the practice. It makes the basis of each conclusion visible and prevents a concise product from implying work it has not performed.

This is a professional observation, not a statistical claim or a project-specific conclusion.

Questions to put on the record

Ask for answers that can be checked.

  1. What decision am I trying to make?
  2. Can that decision be made from the assessment, or must documents be checked?
  3. Is there one dominant issue or a connected group?
  4. Which adviser already owns the answer?
  5. Do I need a route, a verified position or implementation?
  6. What is the smallest proportionate next step?

Frequently asked questions

What owners usually ask next.

Can I move directly from the free check to the Resolution Plan?

Yes, where the decision clearly depends on agreed project evidence and evidence-led professional review is proportionate.

Does buying the Decision Pack reduce the later cost?

The Decision Pack includes a qualifying £395 Activation Credit for Project Activation. Any relationship with a Resolution Plan should be confirmed for the particular case rather than assumed.

What if my free result is green?

Retain the record, follow any named actions and continue with the appointed team. There is no reason to buy a pack merely because it exists.

Sources, editorial responsibility and boundaries

This guide explains the Start Ready method and current product scope. No statutory source is presented as governing it. Project documents and appropriately qualified advice remain necessary.

Published by: Planning & Project Advisory Ltd.

Editorial lead: Anthony Lilley. Planning, design coordination and owner-side project context.

Publication record: Published 3 September 2026. Professionally reviewed 3 September 2026. Geographic scope: England.

Method: Primary sources, professional observations and the use of drafting tools are explained in the editorial policy.

Limit: This material is general information. It is not legal advice, technical approval, a compliance certificate or authority to commence work.

Apply it to your project

Check your own position first. Ask for help only if one issue still needs a clear way forward.

Completely free. No card details required.No obligation. Immediate preliminary result.
Check my project readiness
Read about the £395 Decision Pack →